(Photo by Jason Smith/Getty Images)

Why Extreme Rules Should Write Ric Flair Off TV, Why The Pre-Show Match Is A No DQ

(Photo by Jason Smith/Getty Images)
(Photo by Jason Smith/Getty Images)

The third of the four CSR videos talks the Women’s title match and the pre-show match for WWE Extreme Rules 2016. Josh Isenberg starts the show off with his predictions. Justin LaBar and Juice Springsteen then debate some matches while filming at the Squirrel Hill Sports Bar. Here’s some highlights:

Josh Isenberg on Women’s title match:

I think this is the perfect opportunity for Charlotte to stand on her own. I’ve been saying for months Ric Flair shouldn’t be such a strong focus when you have the great push of women’s division talent. A heel Charlotte to show she is the best and retain. My biggest wonder is when is Sasha Banks, Becky Lynch, Bayley? When are they going to be involved and WWE stops relying on the veteran like Nattie?

Juice Springsteen on Women’s title match:

Ric Flair has to be there, get involved and Charlotte loses. That said, if Sasha is an end game to win it at SummerSlam, she has to win it off Charlotte. So does Charlotte lose at Extreme Rules and then win it back? Does Sasha take it off the veteran in Nattie? Does Nattie deserve a title run?

Justin LaBar on pre-show match:

Baron Corbin wins this. It’s on the pre-show but the pre-show match is getting a stipulation because they can at least do a steel chair or something that would otherwise normally be a DQ. Remember, the pre-show is all across social media platforms, some people still haven’t got the Network, so here’s the big bad ass to hate and the blonde pretty boy everyone likes, here’s a little appetizer of extreme to try and give people and get any last minute buys for the PPV.

This episode is presented by WrestleRumble.com—win up to $500, a signed copy of Bill Apter’s book and other prizes for predicting the winners at Extreme Rules.

See the full CSR video below:

 

TRENDING

X
Exit mobile version