POINT 4: TNA (generally) has better in-ring action…
Let's be honest, if wrestling fans really cared about wrestling as their top priority for a good WRESTLING product, more people would be watching Ring of Honor. But truth is, most fans still want that aspect of Sports Entertainment, whether they'd ever admit to it or not. I know that for me, the story and the drama going in is equally, if not more important than the technical aspect of the inevitable match. I think TNA has the best blend of storytelling AND in-ring competition out there. They're not as technically based as Ring of Honor, and their promos and angles aren't always as polished as the WWE, but they blend them together better than either, in my opinion.
For example, I really loved the Kurt Angle vs. Jeff Jarrett feud that went on for quite some time in TNA. Real or not, it had an excellent story and culminated in several great matches. I love what they're doing with Bobby Roode and I'm sure we'll see a lot of good matches with him, AJ Styles, James Storm, Kurt Angle, and maybe even Kazarian at some point! They have decent stories, they have decent wrestling. It's very rare that a WWE match gets me excited these days, and that's why I don't often enjoy their PPV's, which are almost all wrestling.
Flip-side: The bigger names and more developed roster makes WWE matches a bit more exciting by default. Some times a big name and some hype are all you need to sell a match, and WWE definitely has the edge with that.
